yay, another gift from god

puppychow · 08-03-2007, 06:22 PM

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070803/D8QPK4SO0.html

these people piss me off. it's just so selfish and unecessary. shocker his name is jim bob.

PHISH · 08-03-2007, 06:26 PM

How is it selfish? Did I miss the part of the article where the kids were malnourished or something?

puppychow · 08-03-2007, 06:43 PM

imo, no family should have that many kids - the ecological footprint this family has created is astonishing. this planet does not need people breeding like that. the us eventually will have a population problem itself and this doesn't help. it's also taxing on the government.

can you fix my steam id

StatisticZ · 08-03-2007, 07:01 PM

I have no problem with it, but I do in a way. lol.. I have no problem if people have that many kids, and can support and take care of them. BUT, why? Wtf is the point jesus. I knew kids from a mormon family when I was going through school, and they were annoying and shit and I wish they were taking out back and shot. Lol. They just loved telling everyone they were mormon, more power to someone who's proud of their religion but come on lol.

uBeR · 08-03-2007, 07:39 PM

There's an overpopulation problem on this planet. They don't help any.

Scuzzy · 08-03-2007, 07:56 PM

I think they make it fairly clear that it is their believe that God gave them these children, which is why he is important to them and their family. You may not share that belief, but the children are obviously well cared for, I see no problem.

I also do not think that each family should have a limit on children because of their "footprint" on the globe. I'd rather one family produce 20 intelligent, kind, mature individuals then 20 families each produce one abused drug addicted idiot. I think it goes to can the family absorb another child and raise it properly, if the answer is yes, then by all means go for it. Each of their other children is obviously congnescent of the family unit, helps out, and contributes. That's a great family model, it'd be nice if all families worked like that.

Scuzzy

puppychow · 08-03-2007, 08:03 PM

Are you inferring that they they see no coorelation between no birth control and number of babies popping out? Maybe a googlephyte can research that and find their actual stance. If they indeed think every little bundle of joy is given to them by god and that they have no say in that, its kinda sad.

I disagree with your opinion on the footprint issue - i think its a huge deal, enviornmentally, economically, and socially.

clearly this mother needs some class limits on her worked over vagina.

Rider_55 · 08-03-2007, 08:41 PM

These folks are independnetly wealthy so the government government support issue should not be of any concern. They are protestant (Baptist) if I remember correctly so moral objection to birth control should not be the issue. What is terrible to me is that the children have no childhood. As soon as they are old enough to begin to take care of themselves they are required to help take care of a younger sibling. Let your kids be kids not nannies. From what I understand only two things will stop her from having more children.... menopause or death whicheve comes first.

Ihmhi · 08-03-2007, 11:29 PM

I feel bad for that mom.

IT'S A VAGINA, NOT THE LOG FLUME RIDE AT DORNEY PARK.

halo · 08-03-2007, 11:51 PM

Quote:

"We are just so grateful to God for another gift from him,"

Do they not even realise they fucked each other and that produced a child? Or is it just to placate their preacher at the fact they go at it like fucking rabbits from the 1960s.

YomMamasHouse · 08-04-2007, 03:16 AM

Well Gad-zeuks hun it looks like God dun given us our eleventy-eighth little bundle of joy!

Etzell · 08-04-2007, 03:38 AM

So, is that the 18th Jesus now?

Innoc · 08-04-2007, 07:18 AM

But seriously though...overpopulation? LOL...right. Good ole FF...ironically offbase.

Player · 08-04-2007, 09:47 AM

When the world population needs more resources than Earth can give, I would say that is over-population...

Scuzzy · 08-04-2007, 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by puppychow

Are you inferring that they they see no coorelation between no birth control and number of babies popping out?

No, I'm saying they believe there is more to a viable fetus then cells, they believe divine intervention occurs as well.

Quote:

Originally Posted by puppychow

I disagree with your opinion on the footprint issue - i think its a huge deal, enviornmentally, economically, and socially.

Is the impact environmentally, economically, and socially bad if one independently wealthy family as theirs raises 20 children as they are, or 20 drugged out psycho's raise kids to be complete morons? I think if the nurture and funds are there that raising kids, no matter how many, is perfectly acceptable. I think these children will be more environmentally, economically, and socially responsible then many children born to single, drugged addicted psychopaths. Basically my point is this: The number of children has no bearing on their footprint, it's the way their raised. These children are obviously being raised very well.

uBeR · 08-06-2007, 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Innoc

But seriously though...overpopulation? LOL...right. Good ole FF...ironically offbase.

What's the irony?

zSilver_Fox · 08-06-2007, 04:20 PM

The fact that there are millions more people having babies that won't be nearly as good of members to society as those children will be, and that judging the population issue based on ONE family is the equivalent of estimating the wealth of your average American based on someone who's very well off.

Innoc · 08-06-2007, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uBeR

What's the irony?

That those complaining about overpopulation are part of the problem in so far as they're clearly alive enough to post. The earth is no where close to overpopulation.

uBeR · 08-06-2007, 05:11 PM

The Earth is past overpopulation. But if you think bearing no children compared to bearing 17 children for no rational reason (like working on a farm for food or something), then it'll be hard to convince you of anything involving numbers.

puppychow · 08-06-2007, 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Innoc

That those complaining about overpopulation are part of the problem in so far as they're clearly alive enough to post. The earth is no where close to overpopulation.

just because there's stretches in the us of vast openess, as a whoole that doesnt mean theres not a population problem...take a stroll through india or china.

i don't think it's hypocritical to critisize people like this....i plan on having one or two kids, then i'm getting the snippity snip down there.

08-03-2007, 06:22 PM	#1
puppychow Arf! D&A Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts Rated Helpful 1 Times	yay, another gift from god http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070803/D8QPK4SO0.html these people piss me off. it's just so selfish and unecessary. shocker his name is jim bob.

08-03-2007, 07:39 PM	#5
uBeR Not ****** Yet D&A Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Minnesota Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times	There's an overpopulation problem on this planet. They don't help any. __________________ OCCUPATION 101. *One would think a simple task would be, well, simple. Maybe not for simpletons.*

08-03-2007, 07:56 PM	#6
Scuzzy The Old Timers Clan D&A Member Retired FF Staff Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Server: 206.217.134.170:27016 Posts Rated Helpful 2 Times	I think they make it fairly clear that it is their believe that God gave them these children, which is why he is important to them and their family. You may not share that belief, but the children are obviously well cared for, I see no problem. I also do not think that each family should have a limit on children because of their "footprint" on the globe. I'd rather one family produce 20 intelligent, kind, mature individuals then 20 families each produce one abused drug addicted idiot. I think it goes to can the family absorb another child and raise it properly, if the answer is yes, then by all means go for it. Each of their other children is obviously congnescent of the family unit, helps out, and contributes. That's a great family model, it'd be nice if all families worked like that. Scuzzy __________________ "Player Quality, not Quantity, is what we strive for." - The LLama Wrangler "A clan is defined by the nature of it's enemies. - The Llama Wrangler

08-03-2007, 11:29 PM	#9
Ihmhi [AE] 0112 Ihmhi SJB Wiki Team Fortress Forever Staff Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Newark, NJ, United States Class/Position: A little bit o' everythin' Gametype: Also a little bit o' everythin' Affiliations: [AE] Asseater, SJB Straight Jacket Brigade Posts Rated Helpful 3 Times	I feel bad for that mom. IT'S A VAGINA, NOT THE LOG FLUME RIDE AT DORNEY PARK. __________________ Support FF: Anime: The Thread: Reloaded The one and only anime thread on these here forums. Select the pistol, and then, select your horse.

08-04-2007, 07:18 AM	#13
Innoc Hitman 2 1 Actual Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: "Oscar Mike" Gametype: FPS or RTS (just say NO to MMO) Affiliations: Your Mom Posts Rated Helpful 8 Times	But seriously though...overpopulation? LOL...right. Good ole FF...ironically offbase. __________________ Mooga on Obama: He can cut taxes. Actually do something useful. Punch Nancy Pelosi in the face. Just to name a few. You eventually run out of other people's money to spend.

08-03-2007, 06:26 PM	#2
PHISH Retired FF Staff Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: cow college Posts Rated Helpful 13 Times	How is it selfish? Did I miss the part of the article where the kids were malnourished or something?

08-03-2007, 06:43 PM	#3
puppychow Arf! D&A Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts Rated Helpful 1 Times	imo, no family should have that many kids - the ecological footprint this family has created is astonishing. this planet does not need people breeding like that. the us eventually will have a population problem itself and this doesn't help. it's also taxing on the government. can you fix my steam id

08-03-2007, 07:01 PM	#4
StatisticZ My title is... Custom. Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Tri-State Area Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times	I have no problem with it, but I do in a way. lol.. I have no problem if people have that many kids, and can support and take care of them. BUT, why? Wtf is the point jesus. I knew kids from a mormon family when I was going through school, and they were annoying and shit and I wish they were taking out back and shot. Lol. They just loved telling everyone they were mormon, more power to someone who's proud of their religion but come on lol.

08-03-2007, 08:03 PM	#7
puppychow Arf! D&A Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts Rated Helpful 1 Times	Are you inferring that they they see no coorelation between no birth control and number of babies popping out? Maybe a googlephyte can research that and find their actual stance. If they indeed think every little bundle of joy is given to them by god and that they have no say in that, its kinda sad. I disagree with your opinion on the footprint issue - i think its a huge deal, enviornmentally, economically, and socially. clearly this mother needs some class limits on her worked over vagina.

08-03-2007, 08:41 PM	#8
Rider_55 Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times	These folks are independnetly wealthy so the government government support issue should not be of any concern. They are protestant (Baptist) if I remember correctly so moral objection to birth control should not be the issue. What is terrible to me is that the children have no childhood. As soon as they are old enough to begin to take care of themselves they are required to help take care of a younger sibling. Let your kids be kids not nannies. From what I understand only two things will stop her from having more children.... menopause or death whicheve comes first.

08-04-2007, 03:16 AM	#11
YomMamasHouse Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Your Mom's House Posts Rated Helpful 2 Times	Well Gad-zeuks hun it looks like God dun given us our eleventy-eighth little bundle of joy!

08-04-2007, 03:38 AM	#12
Etzell D&A Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times	So, is that the 18th Jesus now?

08-04-2007, 09:47 AM	#14
Player D&A Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Europe Posts Rated Helpful 1 Times	When the world population needs more resources than Earth can give, I would say that is over-population...

08-06-2007, 04:20 PM	#17
zSilver_Fox IRL Combat Medic Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Ethanol Land Class/Position: D Medic Gametype: Conca Jumping Affiliations: ^iv Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times	The fact that there are millions more people having babies that won't be nearly as good of members to society as those children will be, and that judging the population issue based on ONE family is the equivalent of estimating the wealth of your average American based on someone who's very well off. __________________ I have a nasopharyngeal and webcam... First infraction! Flaming!

08-06-2007, 05:11 PM	#19
uBeR Not ****** Yet D&A Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Minnesota Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times	The Earth is past overpopulation. But if you think bearing no children compared to bearing 17 children for no rational reason (like working on a farm for food or something), then it'll be hard to convince you of anything involving numbers. __________________ OCCUPATION 101. *One would think a simple task would be, well, simple. Maybe not for simpletons.* Last edited by uBeR; 08-06-2007 at 07:06 PM.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)