Fortress Forever

Go Back   Fortress Forever > Community > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-02-2007, 11:29 PM   #21
SizeableSSonic
Joystick Junkie
D&A Member
 
SizeableSSonic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: I know where YOU live!
Class/Position: Engineer or Sniper
Gametype: CTF
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
Send a message via AIM to SizeableSSonic Send a message via MSN to SizeableSSonic
Jesse, now would be a convenient time for a leak...
__________________
I like chocolate milk.
SizeableSSonic is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-03-2007, 02:58 AM   #22
jdubbya
 
jdubbya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
What is everyones problem with the dev_2Fort or whatever its called? It looks just like the origional to me, except with better textures.
jdubbya is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-03-2007, 03:10 AM   #23
tu!
 
tu!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdubbya
What is everyones problem with the dev_2Fort or whatever its called? It looks just like the origional to me, except with better textures.
it's not official ff map!
tu! is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-03-2007, 04:18 AM   #24
Skanky Butterpuss
Beware the Hammer
Buffalo Butterpuss
D&A Member
Fortress Forever Staff
 
Skanky Butterpuss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Class/Position: Sabotaging your shit.
Affiliations: :}|, mimic, /KBN/
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
yeah that shit wasnt even supposed to be released. it was just a test map, a direct port of 2fort, so that they could test the dimensions and shit of shit.
__________________
Support FF:
Etzell: Skanky
Etzell: The Wings are fucking fantastic
Etzell: They really are
Etzell: But even SAYING that makes me want to vomit
Skanky Butterpuss is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-03-2007, 04:25 AM   #25
RocKwell
Regular or Menthol?
 
RocKwell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Central MI
Affiliations: :e0: .o`
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skanky Butterpuss
yeah that shit wasnt even supposed to be released. it was just a test map, a direct port of 2fort, so that they could test the dimensions and shit of shit.
Hah, yea there was absolutely nothing new with that map other than textures. Still, it was fun to play with more balanced classes now (except the hw, who practically owns the yard.)
RocKwell is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-03-2007, 04:35 AM   #26
Nuk3m
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Jersey, USA!
Class/Position: Scout / Offense
Gametype: Capture the Flag
Affiliations: :e0: Founder
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
Send a message via AIM to Nuk3m
if they make twofort, im sorry i meant 2fort, like the original, i dont really care to play on it, as i feel they should take the original concept and build on it as they did with maps such as well.
Nuk3m is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-03-2007, 08:13 AM   #27
@BLOODy
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by lollerskates
On the contrary, it's precisely the elite who want to play 2fort and de_dust2 (which has completely eclipsed de_dust in popularity). As soon as FF was released, people immediately set up well 24/7 servers without even looking at the other maps. When TFC started dying, the only remaining active servers were 24/7 2fort and well.
When i played tcf i loved to play 2fort, i didn't dislike other maps but 2fort almost always had good gameplay.And believe me, i was and still am far from elite)
@BLOODy is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-03-2007, 09:47 AM   #28
Stephen
Sniper hater.
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by Desyphur
Also, the bridge on TF2's 2fort is absolutely horrible. Makes sniping hard.
I think that's what they were trying to do with it.
Stephen is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-03-2007, 10:26 AM   #29
פֿяαιп βαмαgεפ
Annoying people since 1986
 
פֿяαιп βαмαgεפ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Belgium a.k.a. absurdistan
Class/Position: O fatty, pyro - D engy, pyro
Gametype: CTF
Affiliations: This space for rent.
Posts Rated Helpful 1 Times
Send a message via MSN to פֿяαιп βαмαgεפ
Well, the maps I played the most on TFC were Well and 2fort closely followed by dustbowl. And yes, I do miss it in the game, haven't found any servers using the dev_ version, I'll keep an eye out and test it out because a Fortress game isn't a Fortress game w/o 2fort!^

I hope some of the custom maps return too!
פֿяαιп βαмαgεפ is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-03-2007, 12:43 PM   #30
Smgzor
Guest
 
Posts Rated Helpful 1 Times
make warpath pls
  Reply With Quote


Old 10-03-2007, 04:37 PM   #31
Desyphur
OHH! OHHH NOOO!
Wiki Team
Beta Tester
 
Desyphur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
Make castleargh pls.
__________________
What was left of my sanity implored me not to enter...but that voice was just a whisper now.
Desyphur is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-03-2007, 04:40 PM   #32
SmellyCat
Darknight
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: England
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by פֿяαιп βαмαgεפ
Well, the maps I played the most on TFC were Well and 2fort closely followed by dustbowl. And yes, I do miss it in the game, haven't found any servers using the dev_ version, I'll keep an eye out and test it out because a Fortress game isn't a Fortress game w/o 2fort!^
There's at least 1 US server playing 24/7 dev_2fort as it is. Madness.
SmellyCat is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-03-2007, 05:49 PM   #33
Xstioph
Guest
 
Posts Rated Helpful 1 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuk3m
if they make twofort, im sorry i meant 2fort, like the original, i dont really care to play on it, as i feel they should take the original concept and build on it as they did with maps such as well.
I disagree. As with many, "well" & 2fort are my two most played maps (played rock2 for as long as it was common on servers), but the thing is that "well" had flaws and the FF version is awesome, but on the other hand, I have nothing to complain about with 2fort, except maybe fixing the spawn rooms, similar to what they did with "well" to avoid that crap that so often go on in pubs with spawn camping and even entering spawns. Imho...
  Reply With Quote


Old 10-03-2007, 05:53 PM   #34
Nuk3m
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Jersey, USA!
Class/Position: Scout / Offense
Gametype: Capture the Flag
Affiliations: :e0: Founder
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
Send a message via AIM to Nuk3m
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xstioph
I disagree. As with many, "well" & 2fort are my two most played maps (played rock2 for as long as it was common on servers), but the thing is that "well" had flaws and the FF version is awesome, but on the other hand, I have nothing to complain about with 2fort, except maybe fixing the spawn rooms, similar to what they did with "well" to avoid that crap that so often go on in pubs with spawn camping and even entering spawns. Imho...
im sorry i didnt explain myself right, then again maybe i did, im for 2fort being made, but I am moreso looking for 2fort 2.0 then plain 2fort. get me?
Nuk3m is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-03-2007, 06:18 PM   #35
Fathom
Guest
 
Posts Rated Helpful 1 Times
I like the TFC 2fort. You could add some tweaks to better it for FF without taking away from the classic parts we all like. I think the spawns should be privatized somehow so enemies can't nade/demo it so easily. Other than that it's a pretty complete map and has a lot of strategy. No reason to reinvent a good thing. I really like the ff version of well (although I am overplaying it on my server) and if they take the same approach to 2fort as they did with well I'm sure it will be fine.
  Reply With Quote


Old 10-03-2007, 08:00 PM   #36
v3rtigo
Lock 'n Loll!
 
v3rtigo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: 2fort
Class/Position: Scout, Spy, Sniper
Gametype: CTF
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
If they keep the basic layout and structure of the map the same, I don't mind it being slightly different, just as long as it benefits gameplay (ff_well)
v3rtigo is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-04-2007, 02:18 AM   #37
greenday5494
Holy shit, thats kerrigan!
D&A Member
 
greenday5494's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Class/Position: D, whatever the team needs, usually engy
Gametype: AvD
Affiliations: None
Posts Rated Helpful 1 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuk3m
im sorry i didnt explain myself right, then again maybe i did, im for 2fort being made, but I am moreso looking for 2fort 2.0 then plain 2fort. get me?
i agree. my sources tell me they are making it less simple. here's hoping to!
greenday5494 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-04-2007, 02:39 AM   #38
jdubbya
 
jdubbya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
2Fort and Well 4Life!
jdubbya is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-04-2007, 04:30 AM   #39
richard nixon
 
richard nixon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
I like the small changes they did with well. I love the new well. But I also hope they (kinda) do the same to 2fort. Not as extreme as blis_2fort because that doesnt remind me of a "classic" 2fort experience (well does remind of of that 'classic' tfc experience, even though it's a little different.)
richard nixon is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-04-2007, 09:25 AM   #40
v3rtigo
Lock 'n Loll!
 
v3rtigo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: 2fort
Class/Position: Scout, Spy, Sniper
Gametype: CTF
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
blis_2fort IMO is much better than the original 2fort in terms of looks: bright, flashy, futuristic textures. The structure of the map has been changed a tad too much tho IMO, but it's still a good map non-the-less. If the team makes something similar to this I sure as hell won't complain.
v3rtigo is offline   Reply With Quote


Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.