03-15-2006, 02:40 AM | #1 |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Davis, CA
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
|
Double Shutdown CTF Map: flagtrap
I have been working on a map for about a month now, and figured it was time to post something about it before the name is taken. Many of you have probably heard me spamming moronic questions in #fortressforever about Hammer, and it was most likely for this map. This is my first map ever, for any game (other than Command and Conquer: Red Alert), and so far it is coming along very nicely. I spent a lot of time considering gameplay before designing it, and feel that I have eliminated most, if not all, of the problems with contemporary CTF maps through my innovative design of the map layout.
What is Double Shutdown you ask? Well, I don't recall any other maps I've played as having it, so hopefully it is a new style that I have created! Basically the bases will have two switches: one for offense and one for defense. This all came due to my desire to combine the best aspects of Shutdown2, Schtop, and Openfire, while maintaining my own complete originality.Like Shutdown2 and Openfire, there will be the ability to activate lasers, but the roles will be reversed. Instead of the offense attempting to deactivate lasers that are usually active, the defense will be scrambling to activate lasers to trap the offense in a relatively cramped area. Like Schtop, the offense will have a switch that opens the doors to the flagroom, but unlike Schtop, the defense will not be able to get into the barricaded area except for the 30 seconds that the doors are open for the offense. In my opinion, this was a large flaw in Schtop, because the ability for the defense to set up in the flagroom made the combination of timed access and getting by the defense that has the luxury of not being attacked whilst setting up very difficult for anyone but the most expert players. This is not to say that I am trying to make my map a no-challenge cap-a-thon, in fact it will be quite the contrary, but I think it will demand more from the defense at the same time to be effective. In Schtop, two engineers and a demoman in the flagroom made it just about impossible to cap, except by sheer luck or horrendously poor choices by the defense. I am VERY open to suggestions, so please leave your thoughts on my design. I will post screenshots very soon, but they will be to show the layout only, not to showcase the map, as the texturing is nowhere near completion, and I haven't even begun the lighting. Note: Please check out my map on Snarkpit for more frequent, journalistic updates. I will use this thread solely for collecting comments and posting media updates. |
|
03-15-2006, 07:54 AM | #2 |
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
|
Yeh Im kinda feelin this but Im also a little unsure. I think it all depends on where the buttons are. If it becomes too much of a chore to get the defenders switch then the whole thing would be superfluous, so the position of the switch is very important. For example schtop, if you employed this system I'd have the def switch down the ramps near the water entrance so that defender has to choose if he can get it.
I think defenders should always be allowed to set up their defence on the flag, otherwise its a bit inconsistent. Say the offence open the FR, and then fail to get the flag, but the defence get an engineer into the FR. He can no set up base and live there the whole time by building a dispenser. I think the flaw in schtop is not that defenders can set up, its that the layout of the FR makes it too hard to get the flag moving. |
|
03-15-2006, 08:20 AM | #3 |
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
|
the flaw in schtop is that it's not played enough LOL
funnest def map ever imo |
|
03-15-2006, 08:41 AM | #4 | |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Davis, CA
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
|
Quote:
As for the defenders getting into the flag room, this really wont be a problem. First of all, if the defenders activate the switch, then they wont be able to get into the flagroom either, as the laser is going to be universally fatal. If the laser isn't activated, then one engineer in the flagroom is hardly something to worry about, and is to be expected. The defense CAN get into the flagroom if neither switch is activated via the alternate tunnel entrace that is open during this time. However, I hardly see how this will be some sort of insurmountable advantage, as I have designed the flagroom in a manner that doesnt really make camping it on defense that advantageous at all. The best areas to set up defense will be in the large rooms where most of the action is meant to take place. I suppose all the "if"s will be answered during the playtesting anyway, but keep the criticisms coming. Also, eat I am not quite following what you mean by if it's too much of a chore it will be superflous... but then you say in schtop you would put it in a place that WOULD make it a chore. perhaps you meant if it ISNT enough of a chore to get to the def switch then it will be superflous... can you explain that for me? |
|
|
03-15-2006, 12:35 PM | #5 |
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
|
I mean if its too hard for the defence to get their switch then you basically have a shutdown map.
|
|
03-15-2006, 01:35 PM | #6 |
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Naaarich
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
|
if there is only one entrance into the flagroom when the secu is "up" whats to stop a decent hw guy sitting there maybe with an sg behind him for back up and ganking everything that tries to come in that way (ala well water route) and then just sitting 1 defender at the switch for when the offy hits thier button to immediatly hit the def button?
effectivly you'd have 6 offy then :/ |
|
03-15-2006, 02:18 PM | #7 |
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
|
nice creativity, but I think the there will be defensive strats to exploit what you are putting into this map. maybe you could make this "defense" button that is used to trap the flag a "once per match" type thing. Sort of a saving grace if the defense can time it right. I am not a very creative person, but since you have been working on this for a while, I bet you could think of a way to limit the defense's power in your map to make it a bit more balanced.
|
|
03-15-2006, 10:27 PM | #8 | ||
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Davis, CA
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
|
Quote:
As for the single tunnel entrance when the security is up... there is nothing stopping an HW from doing that, but why does everyone seem to think that one hw camping suddenly equals an unstoppable force? First of all, by camping in the tunnel he is effectively eliminating himself from defending the entire rest of the base, and considering that the offensive switch is close enough to the flagroom that the offense will be able to get from the switch to the flagroom before the hw could get anywhere near the flagroom, it wouldn't be that great of a camp spot at all. Secondly, if a team decided to post someone there, then the offense would simply have to focus on the main switch-accessed entrances, or figure out a way to get past the hw. That's what concs and shotguns/grenades are for :S. There are plenty of maps in TFC where a HW *could* camp if he wanted to.. yet I don't see how that is any different than my map idea? The tunnel is not going to be some 36-unit wide corridor, it's going to be wide enough to do conc manuevers and the hw will actually have to aim. Besides, I believe the devs are adding a more effective conc effect to ff anyway. Plus, the reason its so hard to get by in the water way is because it's in water, which means you can't conc, you are forced to move slowly, and the fog effect makes it hard to see. Add to that the fact that after a few seconds you start drowning, and that makes for quite a larger challenge than in my map. Quote:
|
||
|
03-15-2006, 10:29 PM | #9 |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Davis, CA
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
|
Ah, now I see what you mean Afty. I can solve that problem by making a forced delay of at least 7-8 seconds from the time the offensive switch is hit before the defensive switch can be activated, or something along those lines.
|
|
03-16-2006, 03:00 AM | #10 |
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
|
voltage has a "defence switch"...
|
|
03-16-2006, 04:55 AM | #11 |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Davis, CA
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
|
Does it have an offensive switch as well?
|
|
03-16-2006, 11:14 AM | #12 |
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
|
Offence can set it off too.
I guess having a look at it is the best way to avoid explaining it! http://www.ozfortress.com/maps.php?map=voltage_l |
|
03-17-2006, 06:25 AM | #13 |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Davis, CA
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
|
Well, that's still totally different than my idea. Cool, but different.
|
|
03-25-2006, 06:56 AM | #14 |
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The Peoples Republic of Harmfull Free Radicals
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
|
Ok, I just got internets back after a semi-lengthy downtime, and it's now time to start bumping old posts!
Wow, cool. I like the idea of the multiple buttons. Bravo. |
|
04-19-2006, 12:18 AM | #15 |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Davis, CA
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
|
Hey guys,
I am really interested in releasing some initial shots of this map, but I have this light_env problem that is totally screwing it up. I don't want to release half-assed shots; I want them to look as good as possible. Basically, the problem I am having is that one edge of the light_env reflection on the floor ends abruptly (in a clean-cut line) instead of the light gently dissipating like the other edges (and like it is supposed to). I've noticed that two of the floor brushes (convieniently right where the stop is) do not render the light_env at all, I've tried tweaking the light_env's angle, but the light still doesn't reflect on those brushes. I tried deleting those brushes and remaking them, but the problem is still present. I cannot release any shots until I fix this problem, and it is also causing me to lose a lot of motivation, which is not a good thing. I've searched the internet/IRC high and low for an answer and have not found one. If anyone has any ideas, please let me know. If anyone really good at mapping (IE: Ginger Lord, the dev team, Imbrifier) would like to look at the .vmf file to see the problem (if that would help), then let me know and I can supply you with it, under the obvious assumption that you wouldn't take any of my work. (Not that you would probably want to, anyway! :P) |
|
04-19-2006, 12:20 AM | #16 |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
|
a guess here, but could it be a lightmap problem?
|
|
04-19-2006, 01:48 AM | #17 |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Davis, CA
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
|
Like what, exactly?
|
|
04-19-2006, 02:19 AM | #18 |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
|
I'll take a look at it if you want.
|
|
04-19-2006, 09:17 AM | #19 |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Davis, CA
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
|
Thanks, I figured it out already. I had a brush split right where the light began dissipating, apparently you can't do that. :P
|
|
04-19-2006, 06:04 PM | #20 | |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
|
Quote:
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|