Fortress Forever

Go Back   Fortress Forever > Editing > Mapping

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-11-2006, 04:49 PM   #1
o_ginger lord
 
o_ginger lord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Carlisle, UK
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
FF_Amped

Righty-ho. Now I have got the source for this, I've started a new thread so we don't get lost in ther abyss of the old thread. What do you like about Amped from the screens and old beta release? What would you like to see changed?

Heres the old thread for the mentally incapable and visually impaired:

http://forums.fortress-forever.com/viewtopic.php?t=1225

Whilst I did a quick run around previously doing some optimisation it looked good, now I have dug deeper the map is quite well constructed but with some glaring problems with the actual build method of it. I could just glaze over it but that would come back and haunt me, so I'm going around and redoing each room at a time.
o_ginger lord is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-11-2006, 05:29 PM   #2
o_blueguy
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
What exactly is proper build method? If you could perhaps briefly explain? I'm curious because I've started mapping recently and I do not want to start learning bad habits which could cause "glaring" problems to my map, resulting in me redoing it.
o_blueguy is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-11-2006, 05:42 PM   #3
o_ginger lord
 
o_ginger lord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Carlisle, UK
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
Well, everyone maps differently so there is no "proper" method but you should never:
  • Use the carve tool
  • Overlap brushes
  • Do lots of little fiddly detail where its not needed
  • Map at grid unit size 1 (Ok, you can do this but things get messy after a while when lining stuff up)
  • Leave unseen faces texture, use NoDraw on these
  • Leave props that you cannot get anywhere near as "Use Vphysics"
  • Leave point_spotlights "Use Dynamic Light" flag on.

Ambex had a large amount of the last two before I optimised his map earlier, just doing about 1/4 of the blue base knocked 10 minutes of the compile time and put the fps up by 30-60fps. Most of this was the dynamic lights.

Whilst the map is a work of art, it could have been made a lot simpler and is giving me headaches now. Its workable but its about twice as complex as is needed.
o_ginger lord is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-11-2006, 05:53 PM   #4
o_darknight
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Yorkshire
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
Make (sure) that it's concable and you can bunnyhop around the map without getting blocked by random stuff on the walls/ceilings, which it looks like you cant do in beta2, from the screenies. Don't know how you'd achieve it though, without destroying its looks...
o_darknight is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-11-2006, 05:56 PM   #5
o_ginger lord
 
o_ginger lord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Carlisle, UK
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
Clip brushes are your friend, I intend to make prop objects non solid (obvious larger things will be, little stuff will be non solid) and the roof area will either be clipped off or clipped so that you can conc up into it and rather than be stopped by a invisible ceiling, Ill clip it at an angle so you can go up there and slide back out rather than get caught up.
o_ginger lord is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-11-2006, 08:05 PM   #6
o_nezumi
 
o_nezumi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The Peoples Republic of Harmfull Free Radicals
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
You mean like A instead of B or C?

o_nezumi is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-11-2006, 08:44 PM   #7
o_ginger lord
 
o_ginger lord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Carlisle, UK
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
Sort of, I'll get a Hammer pic to explain later.
o_ginger lord is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-11-2006, 08:56 PM   #8
o_ambex
 
o_ambex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
Saw you started a new thread, looks allready good comparing to 14 pages and 1.

To Gingerlord:

yes in some areas the brushwork goes overboard, (flagroom for example) that part is kinda hard to do. erm.. and many of other rooms looks clean, but as mentioned before the north side is kinda messed up.. would be great to see how it will look like when you will spicy it up. That idea about conc jumping doesnt sound to be necesarry or is it?

Well keep going pushin on this map while im going to work on amped2. (yes, not surprised yet kids? It's on the way from the hammer factory with more eyecandy and all the stuff amped1 was missing.) But this all is after my studies. Honestly gingerlord can do maps and on some way i still feel that i sucks on mapping, dont know but the clipping tools is kinda awsome now.

I would also see some kind of a new elevator (my old one sucks, had to use the enteties from the tuturial sites because i had like had much interest in making elevators and trains.. and all that stuff you know. My head was thinking more on layout, the look of the map and eyecandy, btw gameplay was also an important thing for tfc..

Well..

Go ahead.
o_ambex is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-12-2006, 01:25 AM   #9
o_donny
 
o_donny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Finland
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
Ambex gave the project to the right guy
o_donny is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-12-2006, 01:48 AM   #10
o_ginger lord
 
o_ginger lord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Carlisle, UK
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
Heres a quick diagram to explain:


Top down view of a corridor but same principle applies to pipes in ceiling etc. Red brushes are clips, black walls and pillars. The clip allows people to conc down the corridor and not get caught on stuff.
o_ginger lord is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-12-2006, 01:59 AM   #11
o_skanky butterpuss
 
o_skanky butterpuss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tampon, FL
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
very nice
o_skanky butterpuss is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-12-2006, 04:37 AM   #12
o_frenchtoast
 
o_frenchtoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Markham, Ontario, Canada!
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
Hah.

Anyhoo, fix the lights!

And why is it FF_Amped? What's wrong with just Amped. I don't like the FF prefix.
o_frenchtoast is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-12-2006, 04:39 AM   #13
o_skanky butterpuss
 
o_skanky butterpuss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tampon, FL
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
thats just the source method of titling maps i guess. mod abbreviation as a prefix. all mods have done it (that i have seen). of course, some have different prefixes based on different game modes, but yeah.
o_skanky butterpuss is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-12-2006, 05:00 AM   #14
o_shadow34721
 
o_shadow34721's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
i thought devs said maps would have to EARN the ff prefix?
o_shadow34721 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-12-2006, 05:07 AM   #15
Circuitous
Useless
Retired FF Staff
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Class/Position: D Soldier, O Scout
Gametype: AvD
Posts Rated Helpful 9 Times
Send a message via AIM to Circuitous Send a message via MSN to Circuitous Send a message via Yahoo to Circuitous Send a message via Skype™ to Circuitous
I don't remember seeing anything about that, although I vaguely recall them not liking it except that it'd make it easier to search for them.
__________________
Look at all those dead links.
Circuitous is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-12-2006, 05:08 AM   #16
o_tennovan
 
o_tennovan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Texas
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
why not just abbreviate with gametype, as said before. CTF_Amped or AVD_Amped or Hunted_Amped or IloveTacos_Amped
o_tennovan is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-12-2006, 05:15 AM   #17
Circuitous
Useless
Retired FF Staff
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Class/Position: D Soldier, O Scout
Gametype: AvD
Posts Rated Helpful 9 Times
Send a message via AIM to Circuitous Send a message via MSN to Circuitous Send a message via Yahoo to Circuitous Send a message via Skype™ to Circuitous
Because 1. what if a gametype doesn't fit into a neat abbreviation? You don't want stupidly complicated prefixes... and you can add the gametype to the beginning anyway, and 2. that doesn't facilitate searching at all.
__________________
Look at all those dead links.
Circuitous is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-12-2006, 05:33 AM   #18
o_frenchtoast
 
o_frenchtoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Markham, Ontario, Canada!
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
How about...

get ready for it...

you ready?

Amped!
o_frenchtoast is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-12-2006, 05:37 AM   #19
o_shadow34721
 
o_shadow34721's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
im fairly sure there was a 20 page arguement about CTF and AVD prefixes a while back and it ended up locked due to degenerating into a flame war.
o_shadow34721 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-12-2006, 05:38 AM   #20
o_frenchtoast
 
o_frenchtoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Markham, Ontario, Canada!
Posts Rated Helpful 0 Times
Like so many other threads here. It's a shame that's what happens. At the Snarkpit you can have huge debates, but it never sinks to insults, so they go on.
o_frenchtoast is offline   Reply With Quote


Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.