|
First off, that sentence didn't make sense, at least not in English. Please proof-read.
Secondly, I'm all for plural marriage, go for it, as long as it doesn't infringe on women's rights, which is where there are quarrels with it. When women get sold as property, there's the problem, not multiple people marrying.
__________________
James, while John had had 'had', had had 'had had' ; 'had had' had had a better effect on the teacher.
|