Quote:
Originally Posted by beees
Hmm, relatively speaking, I don't think it'll matter then. Simple analysis would dictate that each average would just have a constant factor added, which means the order is the same. That is, for A/f > B/f > C/f implies A/f+c/f > B/f+c/f > C/f+c/f. By the way, I don't understand how you can get 100%. It shouldn't even be possible if you're using bayes...
|
Yeah, you're right, it shouldn't matter much if at all. I might still do it because if I calculate the global averages I could also display them somewhere and they might be interesting on their own and to compare to individual records/personal bests.
I only use the Bayesian average for ordering; the real average is displayed. See Wicked_Clown's entry here:
http://parser.ffpickup.com/v2/record...AM_0:1:4454243